Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in the orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusions [Dispositivos de anclaje temporal (TADs) en el tratamiento ortodóntico de maloclusiones de Clase II]

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62574/xkp6ka38

Keywords:

anesthesia, dental care, preventive dentistry

Abstract

Objective: to analyse the use of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in the orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusions. Method: systematic review. Results: 15 scientific articles were reviewed. Conclusion: Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) have emerged as an effective and versatile solution in the orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusions, allowing precise control of complex tooth movements such as retraction, intrusion and distalisation without the need to rely on traditional anchorage structures. Its application not only improves treatment efficiency, reducing time and the need for extractions, but also minimises stress on the alveolar bone, favouring more predictable aesthetic and functional results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alhammadi, M. S., Qasem, A. A. A., Yamani, A. M. S., Duhduh, R. D. A., Alshahrani, R. T., Halboub, E., Almashraqi, A. A. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of class II malocclusion treatment using bi-maxillary skeletal anchorage: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22(1): 1–16. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02363-3

Liu, Y., Yang, Z. jin, Zhou, J., Xiong, P., Wang, Q., Yang, Y., Hu, Y., Hu, J. tian. Meta-analysis dataset comparing orthodonticmini-implants and conventional anchorage reinforcement for maximum orthodontic anchorage. Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice. 2019; 19(4): 1–6. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2019.01.006

Upadhyay, M., Yadav, S. Mini-implants for retraction, intrusion and protraction in a Class II division 1 patient. Journal of Orthodontics. 2017; 34(3): 158–167. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1179/146531207225022140

Soni, D. M., Sharma, R. Retraction of Anterior Teeth with Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADS) – A Review. EAS Journal of Dentistry and Oral Medicine. 2022; 4(6): 132–140. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.36349/easjdom.2022.v04i06.001

Bariar, A., Shetty, S., Desai, A., Adhikari, R. Comparative assessment of three microimplant assisted biomechanical strategies for the simultaneous intrusion and retraction of anterior teeth in relation to alveolar bone stress and change in incisor inclinations – A 3D finite element analysis study. Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal. 2019; 12(2): 747–757. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1697

Rizk, M. Z., Mohammed, H., Ismael, O., Bearn, D. R. Effectiveness of en masse versus two-step retraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Progress in Orthodontics. 2017; 18(1): 1–12. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0196

Al-Thomali, Y., Basha, S., Mohamed, R. N. Pendulum and modified pendulum appliances for maxillary molar distalization in Class II malocclusion–a systematic review. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2017; 75(6): 394–401. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2017.1324636

Ata-Ali, F., Cobo, T., De Carlos, F., Cobo, J. Ata-Ali, J. Are there differences in treatment effects between labial and lingual fixed orthodontic appliances? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17(1): 133–138. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0424-z

Ghannam, M., Kamiloǧlu, B. Effects of Skeletally Supported Anterior en Masse Retraction with Varied Lever Arm Lengths and Locations in Lingual Orthodontic Treatment: A 3D Finite Element Study. BioMed Research International. 2021; 2021(2): 1–12. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9975428

Hamanaka, R., Yamaguchi, R., Kuga, D., Jinnai, S., Komaki, H., Tominaga, J. Y., Yoshida, N. An Efficient Distalization Technique Using Coil Springs and Mini Screws—A Finite Element Analysis. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 2022; 12(20): 1–11. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/app122010346

Ramos-Montiel, R. R. Theoretical epistemic foundation of the maxillofacial cranio-cervico diagnosis Fundamento teórico epistémico del diagnóstico cráneo-cérvico maxilofacial. Rev Mex Ortodon. 2022;74(6):180–182. Disponible en: www.medigraphic.com/ortodoncia

Huang, Y., Sun, W., Xiong, X., Zhang, Z., Liu, J., Wang, J. Effects of fixed functional appliances with temporary anchorage devices on Class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta analysis. Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists. 2021; 10(2): 59–69. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2021.02.001

Amiri, A., Khosravi, S., Arbastan, A. H., Jafarizadeh, S. Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of miniscrews in class i and ii malocclusion patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences. 2022; 20(2): 1–12. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8663795

Upadhyay, M., Nagaraj, K., Yadav, S., Saxena, R. Mini-implants for en masse intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth in a severe class II division 2 malocclusion. Journal of Orthodontics. 2008; 35(2): 79–89. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1179/146531207225022491

Li, J., Zhao, Y., Li, H., Li, H., Lei, L. Effects of force magnitude on torque control in the correction of bimaxillary protrusion with mass retraction. Journal of Orthodontic Science. 2017; 7(1): 1–7. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_65_17

Published

2024-01-01

Issue

Section

Short originals

How to Cite

1.
Pesantez-Solano SM. Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in the orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusions [Dispositivos de anclaje temporal (TADs) en el tratamiento ortodóntico de maloclusiones de Clase II]. CEOD [Internet]. 2024 Jan. 1 [cited 2026 Jul. 27];2(1):1-8. Available from: https://revistasinstitutoperspectivasglobales.rperspectivasinvestigativas.org/index.php/COD/article/view/156

Similar Articles

1-10 of 20

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.