Análisis comparativo de la durabilidad de limas endodónticas de diferentes materiales. Revisión sistemática Comparative [analysis of the durability of endodontic files made of different materials. Systematic review]

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62574/c7q59r25

Palabras clave:

materiales dentales, materiales biomédicos y dentales, asistentes dentales

Resumen

Objetivo: desarrollar un análisis comparativo de la durabilidad de limas endodónticas de diferentes materiales. Método: revisión sistemática en población de 15 articulos científicos. Resultados y Conclusión: La durabilidad de las limas endodónticas está influenciada por una combinación de factores, incluyendo el material de fabricación, el diseño del instrumento, las condiciones clínicas y la experiencia del operador. Las limas de níquel-titanio (Ni-Ti) han demostrado ser superiores en términos de flexibilidad y resistencia a la fatiga cíclica, especialmente en canales curvos, aunque su desempeño puede verse afectado por el uso prolongado y agentes químicos como el hipoclorito de sodio.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Stewart JT, Lafkowitz S, Appelbaum K, Hartwell G. Distortion and breakage of Liberator, EndoSequence, and ProFile systems in severely curved roots of molars. J Endod. 2010;36(4):729-731.

Mauney III DK, Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Cosby HT, Phebus JG. File breakage in conventional versus contracted endodontic cavities. Eur Endod J. 2023;8(4):262-267.

Ahmad M, Roy RA. Some observations on the breakage of ultrasonic files driven piezoelectrically. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1994;10(2):71-76.

Ahmad M. An analysis of breakage of ultrasonic files during root canal instrumentation. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1989;5(2):78-82.

Generali L, Righi E, Todesca MV, Consolo U. Canal shaping with WaveOne reciprocating files: influence of operator experience on instrument breakage and canal preparation time. Odontology. 2014;102(2):217-222.

Khabadze Z, Ismailov F, Makeeva I. Determination of cyclic fatigue of a nickel-titanium COXO SC Pro File using a simulation endodontic unit. Georgian Med News. 2022;(324):54-63.

Mousavi SA, Kargar-Dehnavi V, Mousavi SA. A novel approach to determine the effect of irrigation on temperature and failure of Ni-Ti endodontic rotary files. Dent Res J. 2012;9(3):281-287.

Alam MS, Bashar AK, Begumr JA, Kinoshita JI. A study on FlexMaster: a Ni-Ti rotary engine-driven system for root canal preparation. Mymensingh Med J MMJ. 2006;15(2):135-141.

Gluskin AH, Brown DC, Buchanan LS. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators. Int Endod J. 2001;34(6):476-484.

Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JEA, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod. 2000;26(3):161-165.

de Castro Martins R, Bahia MGA, Buono VTL. The effect of sodium hypochlorite on the surface characteristics and fatigue resistance of ProFile nickel-titanium instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102(4):e99-e105.

Ponti TM, McDonald NJ, Kuttler S, Strassler HE, Dumsha TC. Canal-centering ability of two rotary file systems. J Endod. 2002;28(4):283-286.

Guelzow A, Stamm O, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation. Int Endod J. 2005;38(10):743-752.

D’Amario M, Baldi M, Petricca R, De Angelis F, El Abed R, D’Arcangelo C. Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals. J Endod. 2013;39(12):1581-1584.

Howait M. Reciproc endodontic file surface defects after single use: an SEM analysis. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2021;11(1):98-103.

Generali L, Malovo A, Bolelli G, Borghi A, La Rosa GRM, Puddu P, et al. Mechanical properties and metallurgical features of new green NiTi reciprocating instruments. Mater (Basel). 2020;13(17):3736.

Vakili-Gilani P, Tavanafar S, Saleh ARM, Karimpour H. Shaping ability of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated L-shaped canals: OneShape, Hero Shaper, and Revo-S. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):378.

Ahluwalia Y, Sharma U, Kumar N, Malik A, Singh A, Narayan A. Adaptation of single-cone gutta-percha in curved canals prepared and obturated with Protaper and Heroshaper systems by using cone beam computed tomography. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019;9(2):185-193.

Conceição I, Ferreira I, Braga AC, Pina-Vaz I. Simulated root canals preparation time, comparing ProTaper Next and WaveOne Gold systems, performed by an undergraduate student. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(8):e730-e735.

Descargas

Publicado

2024-12-05

Cómo citar

1.
Guamán-Llambo ME, Medina-Acurio FE, Salazar-Martínez KD, Pérez-Villalba LD. Análisis comparativo de la durabilidad de limas endodónticas de diferentes materiales. Revisión sistemática Comparative [analysis of the durability of endodontic files made of different materials. Systematic review]. SRS [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 5 [cited 2026 Jul. 27];3(Odontologia):76-82. Available from: https://revistasinstitutoperspectivasglobales.rperspectivasinvestigativas.org/index.php/sanitas/article/view/520