Amalgams vs. composites over the years [Amalgamas versus composites a través de los años]
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62574/6pk4ny47Keywords:
endodontics, regenerative endodontics, esthetics dentalAbstract
Objective: to carry out a comparative study between amalgams versus composites through the years from a documentary review. Method: systematic population-based review of 15 scientific articles. Results and Conclusion: The choice between amalgams and composites in dentistry depends on a balance between durability, esthetics, biocompatibility, cost, placement technique, environmental impact and current preference. Amalgams stand out for their greater durability, lower cost and ease of placement, but their limited esthetics and environmental and health concerns related to mercury have reduced their use.
Downloads
References
Naranjo Méndez J, Valdiviezo Gilces MJ. Efectividad y durabilidad de restauraciones de resina y amalgama, estudio comparativo: Effectiveness and durability of resin and amalgam restorations, comparative study. eoug [Internet]. 4 de enero de 2023 [citado 3 de enero de 2025];6(1):29-36.
Sakaguchi Ronald D, Ferracane Jack P, Powers John. PhD. Role and Significance of Restorative Dental Materials. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials [Internet]. 2019; 14:1–3. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780323478212/craigs-restorative-dental-materials
Sonarkar S, Uttarwar V, Gunwal M, Pradhan M, Mokhade V, Kokane V, et al. Clinical Longevity of Dental Amalgam V/S Resins Based Composites-A Literature Review. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-ISSN [Internet]. 2019;18.
Morales Fuentes I, Reyes Gil R. Mercurio y salud en la odontología. Rev Saude Publica [Internet]. 2003;37(2):266–72.
Umesi DC, Oremosu OA, Makanjuola JO. Amalgam phase down: baseline data preceding implementation in Nigeria. Int Dent J. 2020;70(3):161-166. doi:10.1111/idj.12536
Patini R, Spagnuolo G, Guglielmi F, Staderini E, Simeone M, Camodeca A, et al. Clinical Effects of Mercury in Conservative Dentistry: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. 2020; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8857238
Hofsteenge JW, Scholtanus JD, Özcan M, Nolte IM, Cune MS, Gresnigt MMM. Clinical longevity of extensive direct resin composite restorations after amalgam replacement with a mean follow-up of 15 years. J Dent. 2023;130:104409. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104409
Aggarwal VR, Pavitt S, Wu J, et al. Assessing the perceived impact of post Minamata amalgam phase down on oral health inequalities: a mixed-methods investigation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):985. Published 2019 Dec 21. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4835-1
Alshehri N, Aljamhan A, Bin-Shuwaish M. The effects of amalgam contamination and different surface modifications on microleakage of dentin bonded to bulk fill composite when using different adhesive protocols. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):186. Published 2022 May 18. doi:10.1186/s12903-022-02214-1
Makanjuola JO, Umesi DC, Ndukwe AN, et al. Managing the phase-down of amalgam amongst Nigerian dental professionals and students: A national survey. Eur J Dent Educ. 2020;24(4):666-678. doi:10.1111/eje.12554
Essa AY, Ahmed S, Dyason A, Karjiker F, Adam RZ. Teaching and placement of dental amalgam restorations at South African dental schools. Front Oral Health. 2023;4:1118361. Published 2023 Jul 19. doi:10.3389/froh.2023.1118361
Rasines Alcaraz MG, Veitz-Keenan A, Sahrmann P, Schmidlin PR, Davis D, Iheozor-Ejiofor Z. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(3):CD005620. Published 2014 Mar 31. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005620.pub2
Worthington HV, Khangura S, Seal K, et al. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent posterior teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;8(8):CD005620. Published 2021 Aug 13. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005620.pub3
Hofsteenge JW, Fennis WMM, Kuijs RH, et al. Clinical survival and performance of premolars restored with direct or indirect cusp-replacing resin composite restorations with a mean follow-up of 14 years. Dent Mater. 2023;39(4):383-390. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2023.03.004
Hurst D. Amalgam or composite fillings--which material lasts longer?. Evid Based Dent. 2014;15(2):50-51. doi:10.1038/sj.ebd.6401026
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Copyright (c) 2024 By the authors. This article is open access and distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
