Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(3), 56-65, 2024

Eficiencia y celeridad constitucional versus la deficiencia contenciosa administrativa: Nuevo rol de los jueces

constitucionales

Constitutional efficiency and speed versus administrative litigation deficiencies: The new role of constitutional

judges

Carlos Alberto Almeida-Alvarado

Constitutional efficiency and speed versus administrative litigation

deficiencies: The new role of constitutional judges

Eficiencia y celeridad constitucional versus la deficiencia contenciosa

administrativa: Nuevo rol de los jueces constitucionales

Carlos Alberto Almeida-Alvarado

calmeidaa@ecotec.edu.ec

Universidad Tecnológica ECOTEC, Guayaquil, Guayas, Ecuador

https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6782-5990

Yessenia del Cisne Palomino-Encalada

yeca.88@hotmail.com

Red de Investigación Koinonia, Guayaquil, Guayas, Ecuador

https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9064-0616

ABSTRACT

The research objective was to analyse constitutional efficiency and speed versus administrative

litigation deficiencies as a new role for constitutional judges. The methodology was based on a

descriptive, qualitative approach using content analysis of 15 scientific articles from peer-reviewed

and indexed journals. The comparative analysis shows that the full effectiveness of the principles of

constitutional efficiency and speed is essential to overcome the structural and procedural

shortcomings of administrative litigation in Ecuador. Likewise, the incorporation of peremptory time

limits, monitoring mechanisms, and the timely use of expedited procedural remedies demonstrate

how the new role of constitutional judges transcends mere control of legality, positioning themselves

as active agents who guarantee effective judicial protection, promote responsible public

administration and strengthen the rule of law by reconciling procedural speed with substantive

justice for the benefit of citizens.

Descriptors: constitutional law; public law; administrative law. (Source: UNESCO Thesaurus).

RESUMEN

Se planteó como objetivo de investigación analizar la eficiencia y celeridad constitucional versus la

deficiencia contenciosa administrativa como nuevo rol de los jueces constitucionales. Se trabajó

metodológicamente a partir del enfoque cualitativo de tipo descriptivo documental con análisis de

contenido en 15 articulos científicos provenientes de revistas arbitradas e indexadas. El análisis

comparativo demuestra que la plena efectividad de los principios de eficiencia y celeridad

constitucional resulta indispensable para superar las carencias estructurales y procesales del

contencioso administrativo en Ecuador; asimismo, la incorporación de plazos perentorios,

mecanismos de seguimiento y el uso oportuno de recursos procesales acelerados evidencian cómo

el nuevo rol de los jueces constitucionales trasciende el mero control de legalidad, configurándose

como agentes activos que garantizan la tutela judicial efectiva, promueven una administración

pública responsable y afianzan el Estado de Derecho, al conciliar la rapidez procesal con la justicia

material en beneficio de la ciudadanía.

Descriptores: derecho constitucional; derecho público; derecho administrativo. (Fuente: Tesauro

UNESCO).

Received: 07/04/2024. Reviewed: 07/12/2024. Approved: 07/17/2024. Published: 09/01/2024.

Research articles section

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(3), 56-65, 2024

Eficiencia y celeridad constitucional versus la deficiencia contenciosa administrativa: Nuevo rol de los jueces

constitucionales

Constitutional efficiency and speed versus administrative litigation deficiencies: The new role of constitutional

judges

Carlos Alberto Almeida-Alvarado

Yessenia del Cisne Palomino-Encalada

INTRODUCTION

The study of constitutional efficiency and speed as guiding principles of judicial

action is particularly relevant in Ecuador, given that the Constitution of the Republic

enshrines the right to effective protection and due process as fundamental

guarantees (Andrade-Ureña, 2022). In this sense, constitutional efficiency is an

imperative that obliges judicial bodies, especially the Constitutional Chamber, to

articulate procedural mechanisms that allow for the prompt and adequate

satisfaction of the rights protected in the Constitution. Through constitutional

specificity, judges guide their decisions within previously established limits,

reducing excessive discretion and promoting regulatory predictability without

undermining substantive justice (Restrepo & Guevara, 2024).

Likewise, the incorporation of the principle of speed in the General Code of

Procedure (COGEP) has sought to harmonise the endemic slowness of the

contentious-administrative process with the requirements of constitutional

protection. Specifically, Jarama-Castillo, Vásquez-Chávez & Durán-Ocampo (2019)

highlight that the setting of peremptory deadlines and the reorganisation of

hearings have contributed to shortening processing times, even though challenges

related to the allocation of human and technological resources remain. Indeed, the

absence of performance indicators that allow for the systematic measurement of the

impact of these reforms hinders the full evaluation of their effectiveness, which

requires the creation of standardised statistical monitoring systems.

On the other hand, comparative experience in contentious-administrative justice

highlights the tension between guaranteeing access to jurisdiction and the need to

avoid court congestion. In this regard, Mejía-Guerrero & Salamanca-Giral (2020)

highlight that the decentralisation of powers and the implementation of virtual

courts for electronic litigation have promoted expedited access to the administration

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(3), 56-65, 2024

Eficiencia y celeridad constitucional versus la deficiencia contenciosa administrativa: Nuevo rol de los jueces

constitucionales

Constitutional efficiency and speed versus administrative litigation deficiencies: The new role of constitutional

judges

Carlos Alberto Almeida-Alvarado

Yessenia del Cisne Palomino-Encalada

of justice, reducing notification and evidence presentation times. However, they

warn of the urgent need to improve the interoperability of systems and to provide

ongoing training to judges, clerks and legal operators in the use of digital platforms,

in order to avoid processing errors and safeguard the integrity of electronic files.

In addition, it is essential to analyse the coordination between the preliminary

administrative procedure and the contentious-administrative judicial process, since

the lack of file screening and the absence of mandatory conciliation hearings

encourage inappropriate litigation that unnecessarily delays the resolution of

disputes (Hunter-Ampuero, 2020). In this regard, the adoption of early mediation

and prior conciliation mechanisms, inspired by international best practices, could

alleviate the workload of the courts and ensure consensual solutions before

resorting to strict judicial proceedings. Likewise, optimising the pre-trial phase

strengthens the quality of judicial protection by allowing for a more in-depth

examination of factual and legal issues before the formal commencement of

litigation.

Consequently, the role of constitutional judges as guarantors of speed and efficiency

in the protection of constitutional rights takes on a new dimension through the

application of the constitutional compliance process and accelerated precautionary

measures (Vásquez-Dongo, 2021). This enables provisional rulings to be issued to

halt administrative acts that violate fundamental rights, even when the ordinary

contentious-administrative procedure is still pending. This precautionary measure

not only ensures the immediate protection of relevant legal rights, but also helps to

dispel the risk of irreparable damage while the main proceedings are ongoing.

Based on the above, the research objective is to analyse constitutional efficiency

and speed versus administrative litigation deficiencies as a new role for

constitutional judges.

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(3), 56-65, 2024

Eficiencia y celeridad constitucional versus la deficiencia contenciosa administrativa: Nuevo rol de los jueces

constitucionales

Constitutional efficiency and speed versus administrative litigation deficiencies: The new role of constitutional

judges

Carlos Alberto Almeida-Alvarado

Yessenia del Cisne Palomino-Encalada

METHOD

The study was conducted using a qualitative, descriptive, documentary approach

aimed at understanding perceptions and practices surrounding constitutional

efficiency and speed in the contentious-administrative process. This design allowed

for the exploration of legal phenomena through the collection and analysis of

contextualised information, without attempting to generalise results to large

populations.

The population context was based on the content analysis of 15 scientific articles

from peer-reviewed journals indexed in the following databases: Scielo, Scopus,

Latindex, and Redalyc. Thus, qualitative content analysis was used to process the

information collected, with the aim of identifying the salient aspects of the research

topic in order to structure a comparative corpus presented in Table 1 and

subsequently carry out the discussion section.

RESULTS

Table 1 compares the constitutional principles of procedural efficiency and speed

with the deficiencies observed in Ecuador's contentious-administrative proceedings.

It emphasises the emerging role of constitutional judges as guarantors of effective

judicial protection, who, through their function, seek to overcome the structural and

procedural limitations that affect public administration and access to justice.

Table 1.

Comparison between constitutional efficiency and speed versus

administrative litigation deficiencies as the new role of constitutional judges in

Ecuador

Aspect

Efficiency and

constitutional speed

Deficiencies in the

administrative

litigation process

New role of

constitutional judges

What does it mean?

Ensuring that

administrative and

judicial processes are

fast, clear, and

effective to protect

rights.

Problems such as

delays, bureaucracy,

and lack of access that

hinder the proper

functioning of

administrative justice.

Constitutional judges

must intervene to

ensure that processes

are fair, swift, and

respect rights.

Legal basis and

context

Constitutional

principles aimed at

improving public

The reality shows that

administrative

processes are often

The Constitution and

jurisprudence grant

judges a more active

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(3), 56-65, 2024

Eficiencia y celeridad constitucional versus la deficiencia contenciosa administrativa: Nuevo rol de los jueces

constitucionales

Constitutional efficiency and speed versus administrative litigation deficiencies: The new role of constitutional

judges

Carlos Alberto Almeida-Alvarado

Yessenia del Cisne Palomino-Encalada

administration and

electoral processes in

Ecuador.

slow and complicated,

affecting citizens.

role to correct these

flaws and protect

rights.

Problems faced

The need for

procedures and

hearings not to be

delayed and to be

resolved promptly to

avoid injustices.

Lengthy processes,

lack of resources, and

little decentralization

that hinder access to

administrative justice.

Judges must ensure

there are no

unjustified delays and

that justice is

accessible to all.

Impact on public

administration

Improves citizens'

trust in institutions by

making public

management more

efficient and

transparent.

Slowness and

bureaucracy generate

distrust and affect the

legal certainty of

individuals and

businesses.

Constitutional judges

act to ensure public

administration fulfills

its duty efficiently and

responsibly.

Relation to electoral

processes

These principles also

help ensure electoral

processes are clear

and resolved without

delays.

Although not the main

focus, administrative

delays can affect

electoral processes

and related rights.

Judges can protect

electoral rights when

affected by

administrative failures.

Proposals for

improvement

Implement rules that

require processes to

be faster and less

bureaucratic, as

established by the

General Organic Code

of Processes.

Create virtual courts,

decentralize

competencies, and

simplify procedures to

facilitate access to

justice.

Strengthen

constitutional control

so judges can act

quickly and effectively

against deficiencies.

Practical examples

Use of the principle of

speed in hearings and

administrative

procedures to avoid

unnecessary delays.

Cases where appeals

and claims take too

long, affecting those

seeking justice.

Judicial interventions

to ensure deadlines

are met and

constitutional rights

are respected.

Consequences of non-

compliance

If efficiency is not

respected, there may

be sanctions and

annulment of

administrative acts.

Delays can violate

fundamental rights

and generate legal

uncertainty for

citizens.

Judges can limit

administrative

discretion and

demand respect for

constitutional

principles.

Source: Prepared by the author.

Therefore, the effective application of the principles of constitutional efficiency and

speed is essential to overcome the shortcomings of the administrative litigation

process in Ecuador. The new role of constitutional judges is emerging as an essential

mechanism for guaranteeing effective judicial protection, promoting a more

responsible public administration that is respectful of fundamental rights. This

strengthens the rule of law and advances towards a more accessible, agile and

reliable administrative justice system for citizens.

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(3), 56-65, 2024

Eficiencia y celeridad constitucional versus la deficiencia contenciosa administrativa: Nuevo rol de los jueces

constitucionales

Constitutional efficiency and speed versus administrative litigation deficiencies: The new role of constitutional

judges

Carlos Alberto Almeida-Alvarado

Yessenia del Cisne Palomino-Encalada

DISCUSSION

It is also worth noting that the regulatory developments incorporating the principle

of expeditiousness into the General Code of Procedure (Jarama-Castillo, Vásquez-

Chávez, & Durán-Ocampo, 2019) have represented a substantial advance in setting

deadlines and streamlining hearings. However, these regulations lack standardised

statistical monitoring mechanisms, which makes it difficult to accurately measure

their real impact on the length of proceedings. As a result, there is a gap between

the letter of the law and its practical application, as the accumulation of cases and

insufficient human and technological resources in the courts prolong the time it

takes to resolve cases (Wunder-Hachem & Gabardo, 2018).

On the other hand, considering the constitutional principle of administrative

efficiency developed by Wunder-Hachem & Gabardo (2018), it should be

emphasised that its violation not only leads to the nullity of administrative acts, but

also entails the potential enforceability of the State's financial liability. Indeed,

Ecuadorian case law has begun to recognise the standing of individuals to seek

compensation for damages resulting from unjustified delays (Zurita-Morales et al.,

2024), which reinforces the remedial dimension of the legal system and acts as a

deterrent to omissive conduct by public officials.

Similarly, a comparative study of contentious proceedings against administrative

acts of decentralised autonomous governments (Navarro-Betancourt, Díaz-

Campana, & García-Segarra, 2025) reveals that the creation of virtual courts and

the decentralisation of powers have facilitated the reduction of time limits for the

presentation of evidence and notification of the parties, although challenges remain

in terms of system interoperability and specialised training for operators. In this

regard, Mejía-Guerrero & Salamanca-Giral (2020) highlight the importance of

implementing uniform protocols for the management of electronic files and

standardising the formats of proceedings in order to optimise procedural

traceability and minimise notification errors.

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(3), 56-65, 2024

Eficiencia y celeridad constitucional versus la deficiencia contenciosa administrativa: Nuevo rol de los jueces

constitucionales

Constitutional efficiency and speed versus administrative litigation deficiencies: The new role of constitutional

judges

Carlos Alberto Almeida-Alvarado

Yessenia del Cisne Palomino-Encalada

Consequently, it is worth analysing the relationship between administrative

procedure and judicial process in municipal illegality claims, given that Hunter-

Ampuero (2020) argues that the lack of prior screening of files and the absence of

mandatory conciliation hearings generate excessive and inadmissible litigation,

saturating the contentious-administrative courts. Similarly, Núñez-Torres (2019)

mentions the need to strengthen the pre-trial phase by implementing mediation and

early conciliation mechanisms that allow conflicts to be resolved expeditiously and

avoid unnecessary recourse to the courts by citizens.

Similarly, the experience of appeals in Spanish case law, analysed by De-las-Heras-

Vives (2015), shows that indiscriminate appeals contribute to excessively

prolonging proceedings and increasing the workload of the higher courts.

Consequently, the adoption of more restrictive admissibility criteria is proposed, as

well as the establishment of preliminary instances for assessing the viability of

appeals, with the aim of filtering out those appeals that lack substance or

substantive legal relevance.

Furthermore, the analysis of the principle of constitutional specificity, reviewed by

Restrepo & Guevara (2024) in the Colombian context, provides keys to delimiting

judicial discretion and ensuring that decisions comply with the normative

parameters pre-established by the Constitution. In this way, the constitutional judge

assumes a dynamic role, but within predictable margins that guarantee legal

certainty. Similarly, Andrade-Ureña (2022) emphasises that constitutional

unconventionality imposes a standard of interpretation that restricts arbitrariness

and promotes consistency between administrative law and constitutional principles.

Consequently, it is worth examining the role of the Constitutional Chamber in its

function of prior control and in its power to issue accelerated precautionary

protection, as described by Vásquez-Dongo (2021). As such, the implementation of

provisional measures, such as orders for the immediate suspension of acts that

violate fundamental rights, represents an effective instrument for protecting urgent

legal rights without neglecting due process. However, it is necessary to establish

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(3), 56-65, 2024

Eficiencia y celeridad constitucional versus la deficiencia contenciosa administrativa: Nuevo rol de los jueces

constitucionales

Constitutional efficiency and speed versus administrative litigation deficiencies: The new role of constitutional

judges

Carlos Alberto Almeida-Alvarado

Yessenia del Cisne Palomino-Encalada

clear criteria for the admissibility of such measures in order to avoid their

indiscriminate use and the overload of precautionary requests.

Similarly, Fierro-Carbonell & Alcalá-Rodríguez (2022) have highlighted the

importance of collegiate oversight of acts with financial implications, through the

creation of special bonuses for the State Attorney General's Office, which can help

to strengthen the supervision of administrative legality and prevent actions that

violate the principle of efficiency. In this regard, it is advisable to promote inter-

institutional coordination between the Public Prosecutor's Office, the State

Comptroller's Office and the contentious-administrative courts, in order to enhance

the exchange of information and avoid duplication of control.

In addition, the practical application of administrative conciliation, analysed by

Torres-Osorio (2021), provides an effective alternative for conflict resolution without

the need to reach a judgment. Indeed, conciliation prevents procedural attrition and

promotes consensual solutions, while also reducing the workload of the courts.

However, it is essential to guarantee the impartiality of the conciliator and the

genuine willingness of the parties, as well as to provide oversight mechanisms to

validate the effectiveness of the agreements reached.

Similarly, the decentralisation of powers and the creation of virtual courts, as

outlined by Mejía-Guerrero & Salamanca-Giral (2020), require a digital governance

approach that takes into account information security, file confidentiality and the

robustness of IT systems. In this regard, it is suggested that international

cybersecurity standards be adopted and that periodic audits be carried out to certify

the integrity of electronic processes.

In addition, it is worth reflecting on the relationship between the theory of Peruvian

contentious-administrative procedure, described by Ordóñez (2003), and its

possible adaptation to the Ecuadorian context. In particular, the Peruvian model of

administrative dispute resolution offers guidelines for establishing mandatory

hearings and peremptory deadlines that encourage the rapid resolution of disputes.

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(3), 56-65, 2024

Eficiencia y celeridad constitucional versus la deficiencia contenciosa administrativa: Nuevo rol de los jueces

constitucionales

Constitutional efficiency and speed versus administrative litigation deficiencies: The new role of constitutional

judges

Carlos Alberto Almeida-Alvarado

Yessenia del Cisne Palomino-Encalada

However, any transfer must take into account the unique characteristics of our

constitutional system and the existing level of institutional development.

Similarly, the review by Castro-Pizarro, Masache-Romero & Durán-Ocampo (2019)

on the application of public law in Ecuador raises the need to strengthen the training

of judges and magistrates in constitutional and administrative law so that they can

consistently apply the principles of efficiency and speed without disregarding the

substantive elements of substantive justice. In this regard, University and Society

has proposed the creation of continuing specialisation programmes that integrate

teaching and learning methods based on practical cases and procedural simulations.

Similarly, the study by Jarama-Castillo et al. (2019) suggests that hearing times can

be optimised through the use of case management tools and intelligent scheduling

of court agendas, which requires an administrative modernisation policy involving

adequate financial resources and specialised technical advice.

CONCLUSION

The comparative analysis demonstrates that the full effectiveness of the principles

of constitutional efficiency and speed is essential to overcome the structural and

procedural shortcomings of administrative litigation in Ecuador. Likewise, the

incorporation of peremptory time limits, monitoring mechanisms, and the timely use

of expedited procedural remedies demonstrate how the new role of constitutional

judges transcends mere control of legality, positioning them as active agents who

guarantee effective judicial protection, promote responsible public administration

and strengthen the rule of law by reconciling procedural speed with substantive

justice for the benefit of citizens.

FINANCING

Non-monetary

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

There is no conflict of interest with individuals or institutions linked to the research.

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(3), 56-65, 2024

Eficiencia y celeridad constitucional versus la deficiencia contenciosa administrativa: Nuevo rol de los jueces

constitucionales

Constitutional efficiency and speed versus administrative litigation deficiencies: The new role of constitutional

judges

Carlos Alberto Almeida-Alvarado

Yessenia del Cisne Palomino-Encalada

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

To the lawyers of Ecuador.

REFERENCES

Andrade-Ureña, R. F. (2022). Principios constitucionales no convencionales de aplicación en el

derecho administrativo y énfasis en el derecho electoral ecuatoriano [Non-conventional

constitutional principles of application in administrative law and emphasis on Ecuadorian

electoral law].

Estado & Comunes, Revista de Políticas y Problemas Públicos

(14), 37-55.

https://doi.org/10.37228/estado_comunes.v1.n14.2022.241

Castro-Pizarro, J. M., Masache-Romero, C. M., & Durán-Ocampo, A. R. (2019). La aplicación del

Derecho Público en el Ecuador [The application of Public Law in Ecuador].

Revista

Universidad y Sociedad

(4), 350-360.

De-las-Heras-Vives, L. (2015). El recurso de apelación en el proceso contencioso-administrativo a la

luz de la jurisprudencia española [The appeal remedy in the contentious-administrative

process in light of Spanish jurisprudence].

Iuris Tantum Revista Boliviana de Derecho

, (19),

804-825.

Fierro-Carbonell, E. del C., & Alcalá-Rodríguez, L. M. (2022). Prima especial para la Fiscalía General

de la Nación: su reconocimiento en la Ley 4 de 1992 [Special premium for the Attorney

General’s Office: its recognition in Law 4 of 1992].

Nuevo Derecho

(30), 1–10.

https://doi.org/10.25057/2500672X.1440

Hunter-Ampuero, I. (2020). Relaciones entre procedimiento administrativo y proceso jurisdiccional

en el reclamo de ilegalidad municipal [Relations between administrative procedure and

jurisdictional process in municipal illegality claims].

Revista de Derecho (Coquimbo)

, 27, 09.

https://dx.doi.org/10.22199/issn.0718-9753-2020-0009

Jarama-Castillo, Z. V., Vásquez-Chávez, J. E., & Durán-Ocampo, A. R. (2019). El principio de celeridad

en el código orgánico general de procesos, consecuencias en la audiencia [The principle of

speed in the general organic code of processes, consequences in the hearing].

Revista

Universidad y Sociedad

(1), 314-323.

Mejía-Guerrero, N. G., & Salamanca-Giral, N. D. (2020). Acceso a la administración de justicia

contencioso-administrativa: Descentralización de competencias y creación de juzgados

virtuales para litigios electrónicos [Access to contentious-administrative justice:

decentralization of competencies and creation of virtual courts for electronic litigation]. En

M. L. Torres-Villarreal & P. M. Iregui-Parra (Eds.),

Diálogos interdisciplinarios sobre los

problemas de la justicia en Colombia

(pp. 35-56). Editorial Universidad del Rosario;

Fundación Hanns Seidel. https://books.scielo.org/id/ywd5x

https://doi.org/10.12804/urosario9789587845617

Navarro-Betancourt, D., Diaz-Campana, M., & García-Segarra, H. (2025). Eficacia de la acción

contenciosa contra los actos administrativos de los gobiernos autónomos descentralizados

[Effectiveness of contentious action against administrative acts of decentralized autonomous

governments].

CIENCIAMATRIA

(1), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.35381/cm.v11i1.1526

Núñez-Torres, K. (2019). La evolución del procedimiento administrativo y el COA en el Ecuador [The

evolution of administrative procedure and the COA in Ecuador].

Revista San Gregorio

, (33),

149-159. https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v1i33.1029

Ordóñez, J. D. (2003). El proceso contencioso-administrativo en el Perú [The contentious-

administrative process in Peru].

A&C-Revista de Direito Administrativo & Constitucional

167-219.

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(3), 56-65, 2024

Eficiencia y celeridad constitucional versus la deficiencia contenciosa administrativa: Nuevo rol de los jueces

constitucionales

Constitutional efficiency and speed versus administrative litigation deficiencies: The new role of constitutional

judges

Carlos Alberto Almeida-Alvarado

Yessenia del Cisne Palomino-Encalada

Restrepo, J. F., & Guevara, L. J. (2024). Constitutional taxativity or judicial discretionality. A review of

the limits of the Constitutional Court in Colombia [Taxatividad constitucional o

discrecionalidad judicial. Una revisión de los límites de la Corte Constitucional en Colombia].

Estudios Constitucionales

(2), 228-253. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-

52002024000200228

Torres-Osorio, E. del S. (2021). La conciliación contenciosa administrativa. Análisis desde la tutela

judicial efectiva [Contentious-administrative conciliation. Analysis from the perspective of

effective judicial protection].

Prolegómenos

(48), 93-108.

https://doi.org/10.18359/prole.5457

Vásquez-Dongo, L. A. (2021). El proceso constitucional de cumplimiento frente al proceso

contencioso administrativo urgente: Una nueva perspectiva para una tutela más idónea

frente a las pretensiones de cumplimiento contra la administración pública [The

constitutional compliance process versus the urgent contentious-administrative process: A

new perspective for more suitable protection against compliance claims against the public

administration]. Repositorio de la Universidad Católica de Santa María - UCSM.

https://repositorio.ucsm.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12920/11093

Wunder-Hachem, D., & Gabardo, E. (2018). El principio constitucional de eficiencia administrativa:

contenido normativo y consecuencias jurídicas de su violación [The constitutional principle

of administrative efficiency: normative content and legal consequences of its violation].

Cuestiones Constitucionales

, (39), 131-167.

https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484881e.2018.39.12652

Zurita-Morales, C. A., Peña, M. G., Mayor-Jara, J. D., & Rosas-Ramirez, C. I. (2024). El abandono en

las acciones subjetivas contenciosas administrativas y la seguridad jurídica [Abandonment

in subjective contentious-administrative actions and legal certainty].

MQRInvestigar

(4),

4517-4555.

the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/