Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(2), 48-59, 2024

https://doi.org/10.62574/hbsamg92

Sociology of Juvenile Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives on

Rehabilitation and Restorative Justice

Sociología del derecho penal juvenil: Perspectivas críticas sobre la

rehabilitación y la justicia restaurativa

Liliana Paola Monar-Machoa

lmonar2@uti.edu.ec

Indoamerica University, Ambato, Tungurahua, Ecuador

https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8872-0837

ABSTRACT

This article aims to analyse the sociology of juvenile criminal law from a critical perspective on

rehabilitation and restorative justice. The research was conducted using a legal documentary

approach. Four documentary categories have been identified as essential to develop in order to

manage an effective and equitable juvenile criminal justice: i) Principles and foundations of

restorative justice, ii) Practices and approaches to juvenile rehabilitation, iii) Comparison of

juvenile criminal justice systems, iv) Socio-educational impact of socio-educational measures.

These documentary categories underline the need for cultural and organisational change within

judicial institutions, as well as the importance of effective and consistent implementation of

restorative practices. Well-implemented restorative justice and socio-educational measures can

facilitate reintegration and reduce recidivism rates.

Descriptors: civil and political rights; right to justice; constitutional law. (Source: UNESCO

Thesaurus).

RESUMEN

Este artículo tiene como objetivo analizar la sociología del derecho penal juvenil desde una

perspectiva crítica sobre la rehabilitación y la justicia restaurativa. La investigación se llevó a

cabo utilizando un enfoque documental jurídico. Se han identificado cuatro categorías

documentales que son esenciales desarrollar para gestionar una justicia penal juvenil efectiva y

equitativa: i) Principios y fundamentos de la justicia restaurativa, ii) Prácticas y enfoques de

rehabilitación juvenil, iii) Comparación de sistemas de justicia penal juvenil, iv) Impacto

socioeducativo de las medidas socioeducativas. Estas categorías documentales subrayan la

necesidad de un cambio cultural y organizacional dentro de las instituciones judiciales, así como

la importancia de una implementación efectiva y consistente de las prácticas restaurativas. La

justicia restaurativa y las medidas socioeducativas bien implementadas pueden facilitar la

reintegración y reducir las tasas de reincidencia.

Descriptores: derechos civiles; derecho a la justicia; derecho constitucional. (Fuente: Tesauro

UNESCO).

Received: 06/02/2024. Revised: 10/02/2024. Approved: 11/03/2024. Published: 01/05/2024.

Research articles section

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(2), 48-59, 2024

Sociología del derecho penal juvenil: Perspectivas críticas sobre la rehabilitación y la justicia restaurativa

Sociology of Juvenile Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives on Rehabilitation and Restorative Justice

Liliana Paola Monar-Machoa

INTRODUCTION

The sociology of juvenile criminal law has experienced considerable interest in

recent years, due to the need to effectively address rehabilitation and restorative

justice for young offenders. This field focuses on understanding how criminal

laws, institutions and practices affect young people, as well as identifying

strategies to promote their social reintegration. Juvenile criminal justice has

traditionally been marked by punitive approaches that do not always succeed in

reducing recidivism and promoting positive youth development. However,

restorative justice has emerged as an alternative paradigm that seeks to repair

the harm caused by crime through the participation of the victim, the offender and

the community, thus promoting reconciliation and rehabilitation.

The study by (Acosta-Stéfani, 2019) highlights the importance of restorative

justice as a new paradigm in juvenile justice, highlighting its potential to transform

the way in which juvenile offending behaviour is addressed. Furthermore,

research such as that of (Bernal-Sánchez & Lescano-Galeas, 2021) underlines

the need to re-signify criminal justice, analysing comparative practices between

Ecuador and Mexico to identify better approaches to juvenile rehabilitation. In this

vein, (Coloma-Villacís, 2022) critically reviews the principles of juvenile justice in

Ecuadorian jurisprudence, highlighting the importance of integrating restorative

approaches into the legal system.

Restorative justice is not only focused on punishment, but on the restoration of

social balance, which implies a significant change in the way young offenders are

perceived and treated. Studies such as that of (Maldonado-Ordoñez & Cabrera-

Cabrera, 2023) analyse the juvenile penal system in Ecuadorian legislation,

emphasising the need to adopt this new paradigm to improve results in juvenile

rehabilitation. Likewise, comparative research on juvenile criminal justice

systems in different countries, such as that conducted by (Reyes-Quilodrán et al.

2018), offers valuable insights into the effectiveness of restorative justice. In this

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(2), 48-59, 2024

Sociología del derecho penal juvenil: Perspectivas críticas sobre la rehabilitación y la justicia restaurativa

Sociology of Juvenile Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives on Rehabilitation and Restorative Justice

Liliana Paola Monar-Machoa

context, it is crucial to critically explore the theoretical and practical perspectives

of juvenile criminal justice and restorative justice, as well as their impact on the

rehabilitation of young offenders.

This article aims to analyse the sociology of juvenile criminal law from a critical

perspective on rehabilitation and restorative justice.

METHOD

The research was conducted using a legal documentary approach, which focuses

on the critical analysis of secondary sources relevant to the study of the sociology

of juvenile criminal law, specifically on critical perspectives on rehabilitation and

restorative justice. This method is considered appropriate due to the

interdisciplinary and theoretical nature of the topic, which requires a thorough

understanding of the legal, sociological and pedagogical concepts involved.

To ensure the relevance and quality of the sources used, an exhaustive search

was conducted in academic databases such as Scopus, Scielo, Redalyc and

Google Scholar. Fifteen scientific articles published in the range of 2016 to 2023

were selected, focusing on empirical studies, systematic reviews and theoretical

analyses addressing juvenile criminal justice and restorative justice. Inclusion

criteria included thematic relevance, methodological rigour and timeliness of the

publications.

The content analysis was carried out through a critical reading of the selected

sources, identifying the main theoretical and practical approaches to

rehabilitation and restorative justice for young offenders. Special attention was

paid to comparative studies between different legal systems, as well as to

relevant jurisprudence and legal frameworks in countries such as Ecuador,

Mexico, Argentina, and others mentioned in the literature reviewed.

Thematic Categorisation

The sources collected were categorised into different themes, including:

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(2), 48-59, 2024

Sociología del derecho penal juvenil: Perspectivas críticas sobre la rehabilitación y la justicia restaurativa

Sociology of Juvenile Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives on Rehabilitation and Restorative Justice

Liliana Paola Monar-Machoa

1. Principles and foundations of restorative justice: Exploring the theoretical

and philosophical bases of restorative justice, and how these apply in the

context of juvenile criminal law (Molina-Vergara, 2022; Rodríguez-Zamora,

2016).

2. Youth rehabilitation practices and approaches: Analysis of rehabilitation

programmes and policies that incorporate restorative elements, evaluating

their effectiveness and the challenges encountered (González-Laurino,

2020; Fernández, 2018).

3. Comparison of juvenile criminal justice systems: Comparative study of

different legal systems and their approaches to juvenile criminal justice

and restorative justice (Reyes-Quilodrán et al., 2018; Bernal-Sánchez &

Lescano-Galeas, 2021).

4. Socio-educational impact of socio-educational measures: Evaluation of

the impact of socio-educational measures on the social reintegration of

young offenders (Maldonado-Cando et al., 2022; Tello-Gilardi, 2022).

ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS

Once the sources had been categorised, the most relevant findings were

synthesised, integrating different perspectives and theoretical contributions. This

process included the identification of common patterns, divergences and areas

of opportunity for future research. Critical reflection focused on assessing the

applicability of restorative approaches in diverse socio-cultural and legal

contexts, considering practical implications and existing barriers.

1. Principles and foundations of restorative justice

Restorative justice is based on a set of theoretical and philosophical principles

that prioritise repairing the harm caused by crime through the participation of the

victim, the offender and the community. This approach seeks to redefine the

traditional response to crime, which has historically focused on punishment,

towards a more constructive and rehabilitative orientation (Molina-Vergara,

2022). According to (Rodríguez-Zamora, 2016), restorative justice is based on

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(2), 48-59, 2024

Sociología del derecho penal juvenil: Perspectivas críticas sobre la rehabilitación y la justicia restaurativa

Sociology of Juvenile Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives on Rehabilitation and Restorative Justice

Liliana Paola Monar-Machoa

the premise that crime not only breaks the law, but also causes significant

interpersonal harm that must be repaired to restore social balance. This paradigm

emphasises the importance of dialogue, reconciliation and shared responsibility,

promoting a process in which all parties affected by crime work together to

achieve true social reintegration of young offenders.

The restorative approach integrates concepts of retributive justice and distributive

justice, focusing on reparation of harm, restitution and rehabilitation of the

offender. This paradigm seeks not only to punish the offender, but also to educate

and rehabilitate him/her, thereby reducing recidivism rates and fostering a safer

and more cohesive social environment. Furthermore, restorative justice

emphasises the importance of empowering victims, providing them with a voice

in the justice process and the opportunity to receive adequate compensation for

the harm they have suffered.

2. Youth rehabilitation practices and approaches

Juvenile rehabilitation programmes that incorporate restorative elements have

proven to be highly effective in reducing recidivism and promoting the positive

development of young offenders. In this vein, (González-Laurino, 2020) highlights

that juvenile justice policies in Uruguay have attempted to implement reforms that

include restorative practices, although these have faced significant challenges

due to institutional resistance and lack of adequate resources. These

programmes often require considerable investment in training and capacity

building for both justice system professionals and young offenders.

On the other hand, (Fernández, 2018), in his analysis of the Reference Centres

in the Province of Buenos Aires, describes how these centres adopt a cultural

and restorative approach in their approach to youth rehabilitation. These centres

have managed to create more inclusive and supportive environments for young

people, promoting their social and educational reintegration. Interventions in

these centres focus on education, vocational training and psychological support,

seeking to address the underlying causes of delinquent behaviour and provide

young people with the necessary tools to build a productive and crime-free future.

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(2), 48-59, 2024

Sociología del derecho penal juvenil: Perspectivas críticas sobre la rehabilitación y la justicia restaurativa

Sociology of Juvenile Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives on Rehabilitation and Restorative Justice

Liliana Paola Monar-Machoa

3. Comparison of juvenile criminal justice systems

Comparison of different juvenile criminal justice systems reveals varied

approaches to restorative justice and rehabilitation. In this regard, (Reyes-

Quilodrán et al. 2018) examine systems in Sweden, England, Italy and Chile,

finding that those countries that have adopted restorative practices tend to show

better results in terms of victim satisfaction and reduced recidivism. These

systems have successfully integrated restorative justice into their policies and

judicial procedures, creating a legal and social framework that supports the

rehabilitation and reintegration of young offenders.

In contrast, (Bernal-Sánchez & Lescano-Galeas, 2021) note that in Ecuador and

Mexico, although there are efforts to re-signify criminal justice, restorative

practices are not yet fully integrated into the judicial system. These countries face

significant challenges in terms of resources, training and cultural changes needed

to effectively implement restorative justice. The findings suggest that the effective

implementation of restorative justice requires not only legislative changes, but

also a cultural and organizational transformation within judicial institutions.

4. Socio-educational impact of socio-educational measures

Socio-educational measures play a crucial role in the social reintegration of young

offenders. In this order, (Maldonado-Cando et al. 2022) evaluated the

effectiveness of these measures in Ecuador, finding that, although there are

programmes designed to offer educational and psychological support, their

implementation is often inconsistent and lacks adequate follow-up. These

measures include educational and training programmes that aim to provide young

people with the skills and knowledge necessary to successfully integrate into

society.

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(2), 48-59, 2024

Sociología del derecho penal juvenil: Perspectivas críticas sobre la rehabilitación y la justicia restaurativa

Sociology of Juvenile Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives on Rehabilitation and Restorative Justice

Liliana Paola Monar-Machoa

While (Tello-Gilardi, 2022) stresses the importance of considering

intersectionality in the implementation of restorative juvenile justice, arguing that

interventions should be tailored to the specific needs of each young person,

considering factors such as gender, ethnicity and socio-economic context. Well-

implemented socio-educational measures can facilitate reintegration and reduce

recidivism rates, contributing to a more inclusive and equitable society. These

interventions not only address the immediate needs of young offenders, but also

work to transform the social structures that contribute to youth offending,

promoting long-term systemic change.

Theoretical contrast

Theoretical contrastation was carried out taking into account the documentary

categories with the theoretical position of various authors, based on what is set

out in table 1.

Table 1. Theoretical foundations of the documentary categories.

Section

Authors

Principles and Foundations of Restorative

Justice

Acosta-Stéfani (2019), Molina-Vergara

(2022), Rodríguez-Zamora (2016)

Juvenile Rehabilitation Practices and

Approaches

González-Laurino (2020), Fernández (2018),

Maldonado-Ordoñez & Cabrera-Cabrera

(2023)

Comparison of Juvenile Criminal Justice

Systems

Reyes-Quilodrán, LaBrenz & Donoso-Morales

(2018), Bernal-Sánchez & Lescano-Galeas

(2021), Coloma-Villacís (2022), Orosco-

Aguilar & Pineda Cando (2023)

Socio-educational Impact of Socio-

educational Measures

Maldonado-Cando, Bustamante-Vera &

Cabrera-Grand (2022), Tello-Gilardi (2022),

Kostenwein (2018), Tantaleán-Olano, Rojas-

Luján, Yache-Cuenca & Recalde-Gracey

(2023), Vázquez Martínez & Bazán

Mayagoitia (2019)

Source: Own elaboration.

Based on the above, restorative justice is based on a series of principles that

prioritise the reparation of the harm caused by the crime, promoting the

participation of the victim, the offender and the community (Molina-Vergara,

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(2), 48-59, 2024

Sociología del derecho penal juvenil: Perspectivas críticas sobre la rehabilitación y la justicia restaurativa

Sociology of Juvenile Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives on Rehabilitation and Restorative Justice

Liliana Paola Monar-Machoa

2022). This approach represents a significant departure from the traditional

punitive model, focused exclusively on punishment, towards a more constructive

and rehabilitative orientation. Therefore, (Rodríguez-Zamora, 2016) points out

that restorative justice not only addresses the legal offence, but also the

interpersonal harm, promoting dialogue, reconciliation and shared responsibility.

Likewise, (Acosta-Stéfani, 2019) reinforces this perspective by highlighting that

restorative juvenile justice is presented as a new paradigm, focused on the

reparation of harm and the social reintegration of young offenders. This approach,

which integrates concepts of retributive and distributive justice, seeks not only to

punish, but also to educate and rehabilitate the offender, reducing recidivism

rates and fostering a safer and more cohesive social environment.

Juvenile rehabilitation programmes that incorporate restorative elements have

proven to be highly effective. In this vein, (González-Laurino, 2020) discusses

reforms in the Uruguayan juvenile penal system, noting that, although they face

institutional and resource challenges, restorative practices have significant

potential to improve rehabilitative outcomes. On the other hand, (Fernández,

2018) analyses the Centros de Referencia in the Province of Buenos Aires,

highlighting how they adopt a cultural and restorative approach to youth

rehabilitation, creating inclusive environments that promote social and

educational reintegration.

While (Maldonado-Ordoñez & Cabrera-Cabrera, 2023) underline the need for

effective implementation of restorative justice in Ecuadorian legislation, arguing

that, to be truly effective, it must be supported by a cultural and organisational

change within the judicial system.

Likewise, (Reyes-Quilodrán et al. 2018) provide a comparative analysis of

juvenile criminal justice systems in Sweden, England, Italy and Chile. They found

that countries that have integrated restorative practices into their judicial policies

tend to have better results in terms of victim satisfaction and reduced recidivism.

This successful integration of restorative justice into judicial systems creates a

legal and social framework that supports the rehabilitation of young offenders.

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(2), 48-59, 2024

Sociología del derecho penal juvenil: Perspectivas críticas sobre la rehabilitación y la justicia restaurativa

Sociology of Juvenile Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives on Rehabilitation and Restorative Justice

Liliana Paola Monar-Machoa

In contrast, (Bernal-Sánchez & Lescano-Galeas, 2021) point out that in Ecuador

and Mexico, although there are efforts to re-signify criminal justice, restorative

practices are not yet fully integrated. The effective implementation of these

practices requires not only legislative changes, but also a cultural and

organisational transformation within judicial institutions.

Accordingly, (Coloma-Villacís, 2022) analyses the principles of juvenile justice in

the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador, highlighting the need for

a critical review and the implementation of restorative practices to improve

juvenile justice outcomes. In addition, (Orosco-Aguilar & Pineda Cando, 2023)

present a critical look at juvenile criminal responsibility in Ecuadorian legislation

and comparative law, highlighting the discrepancies between theory and practice

in the implementation of restorative approaches.

Socio-educational measures play a crucial role in the social reintegration of young

offenders. Accordingly, (Maldonado-Cando et al. 2022) evaluated the

effectiveness of these measures in Ecuador and found that, although there are

programmes designed to offer educational and psychological support, their

implementation is often inconsistent and lacks adequate follow-up.

While (Tello-Gilardi, 2022) stresses the importance of considering

intersectionality in the implementation of restorative juvenile justice, arguing that

interventions should be tailored to the specific needs of each young person,

considering factors such as gender, ethnicity and socio-economic context. Well-

implemented socio-educational measures can facilitate reintegration and reduce

recidivism rates, contributing to a more inclusive and equitable society.

Likewise, (Tantaleán-Olano et al. 2023) highlight the effectiveness of restorative

justice in community conflict resolution in Cajamarca, Peru, showing how these

practices can be adapted to address specific problems in different social contexts.

In contrast to the above, (Vázquez Martínez & Bazán Mayagoitia, 2019) discuss

the procedural and structural challenges in the implementation of restorative

justice and social reintegration, highlighting the need to overcome institutional

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(2), 48-59, 2024

Sociología del derecho penal juvenil: Perspectivas críticas sobre la rehabilitación y la justicia restaurativa

Sociology of Juvenile Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives on Rehabilitation and Restorative Justice

Liliana Paola Monar-Machoa

and cultural barriers to achieve effective implementation. While (Kostenwein,

2018) provides a theoretical and practical perspective on the sociology of criminal

justice, highlighting the need for theoretical precisions and practical distinctions

to better understand the impact of socio-educational measures on juvenile

rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

The importance of implementing restorative justice and socio-educational

measures in the rehabilitation of young offenders is highlighted. Four

documentary categories have been identified as essential to develop in order to

manage effective and equitable juvenile criminal justice: i) Principles and

foundations of restorative justice, ii) Practices and approaches to juvenile

rehabilitation, iii) Comparison of juvenile criminal justice systems, iv) Socio-

educational impact of socio-educational measures. These documentary

categories underline the need for cultural and organisational change within

judicial institutions, as well as the importance of effective and consistent

implementation of restorative practices. Well-implemented restorative justice and

socio-educational measures can facilitate reintegration and reduce recidivism

rates, contributing to a more inclusive and equitable society.

FUNDING

Non-monetary

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

There is no conflict of interest with persons or institutions involved in research.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

To the lawyers responsible for the restoration of young people's rights.

REFERENCES

Acosta-Stéfani, O. A. (2019). Restorative Juvenile Justice The new paradigm [Justicia Juvenil

Restaurativa El nuevo paradigma [Restorative Juvenile Justice The new paradigm].

Revista Sobre Estudios E Investigaciones Del Saber académico, (13), 30-39.

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(2), 48-59, 2024

Sociología del derecho penal juvenil: Perspectivas críticas sobre la rehabilitación y la justicia restaurativa

Sociology of Juvenile Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives on Rehabilitation and Restorative Justice

Liliana Paola Monar-Machoa

Bernal-Sánchez, Narda Beatriz, & Lescano-Galeas, Natalia (2021). Resignifying criminal justice.

An analysis between the practice of Ecuador and Mexico [Resignify criminal justice. An

analysis between the practice of Ecuador and Mexico]. Mexican Bulletin of Comparative

Law, 54(162), e17072. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484873e.2021.162.17072

Coloma-Villacís, P. E. (2022). Principles of juvenile justice in the jurisprudence of the

Constitutional Court of Ecuador: a critical review [Principios de la justicia juvenil en la

jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador: una revisión crítica]. Revista

Ruptura, 3(03), 42. https://doi.org/10.26807/rr.v3i03.87

Fernández, Mariana (2018). Advance research: Youth, responsibility and punishment. A cultural

approach to the juvenile criminal issue in contemporary Argentina: the Reference Centers

of the Province of Buenos Aires [Advance research: Juventud, responsabilidad y castigo.

A cultural approach to the juvenile criminal issue in contemporary Argentina: the

Reference Centers of the Province of Buenos Aires]. Delito y sociedad, 27(46), 75-97.

González-Laurino, Carolina (2020). Reformas que se parecen a sí mismos en el sistema penal

juvenil uruguayo [Reforms that resemble each other in Uruguay's juvenile penal system].

Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 18(3), 129-150.

https://doi.org/10.11600/1692715x.18306

Kostenwein, Ezequiel (2018). Sociology of Criminal Justice: Theoretical Clarifications and

Practical Distinctions [Sociología de la justicia penal: Precisiones teóricas y distinciones

prácticas]. Theoretical Clarifications and Practical Distinctions]. Crime and Society,

27(46), 33-72.

Maldonado-Cando, José Luis, Bustamante-Vera, Andrea Alejandra, & Cabrera-Grand, Johanna

Roció. (2022). Criminal proceedings of adolescent offenders and their effectiveness in

socio-educational measures [Los procesos penales de adolescentes infractores y su

efectividad en las medidas socio-educational]. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 14(6),

236-245.

Maldonado-Ordoñez, J. A., & Cabrera-Cabrera, S. V. (2023). Análisis del sistema penal juvenil en

la legislación de Ecuador y el nuevo paradigma de justicia restaurativa [Analysis of the

juvenile penal system in Ecuadorian legislation and the new paradigm of restorative

justice]. Revista de Derecho, 8(2), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.47712/rd.2023.v8i2.227

Molina-Vergara, M. (2022). Juvenile Justice and Standard Setting. Old and still current reflections

for its understanding and compilation of international instruments on the subject [Juvenile

Justice and Standard Setting. Old and still current reflections for its understanding and

compilation of international instruments on the subject]. Llapanchikpaq Journal: Justicia,

4(5), 73-113. https://doi.org/10.51197/lj.v4i5.639

Orosco-Aguilar, X. A., & Pineda Cando, I. M. (2023). Una mirada crítica a la responsabilidad penal

juvenil en la legislación de ecuador y el derecho comparado [A critical look at juvenile

criminal responsibility in the legislation of ecuador and comparative law]. LATAM Revista

Latinoamericana De Ciencias Sociales Y Humanidades, 4(5), 1458-1478.

https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v4i5.1407

Reyes-Quilodrán, Claudia, LaBrenz, Catherine A., & Donoso-Morales, Gabriela (2018).

Restorative Justice in Comparative Juvenile Criminal Justice Systems: Sweden, England,

Italy and Chile [Comparative Juvenile Criminal Justice Systems: Contrasts between Chile

and Western Europe]. Criminal Policy, 13(25), 626-649.

https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33992018000100626

Rodríguez-Zamora, María Guadalupe. (2016). La justicia restaurativa: fundamento sociológico,

psicológico y pedagógico para su operatividad [The Restorative Justice, Sociological,

Psychological and Pedagogical Foundation for its Operability]. Tla-melaua, 9(39), 172-

187.

Verdad y Derecho

Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales

Vol. 3(2), 48-59, 2024

Sociología del derecho penal juvenil: Perspectivas críticas sobre la rehabilitación y la justicia restaurativa

Sociology of Juvenile Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives on Rehabilitation and Restorative Justice

Liliana Paola Monar-Machoa

Tantaleán-Olano, Juan Ramón, Rojas-Luján, Víctor William, Yache-Cuenca, Eduardo Javier, &

Recalde-Gracey, Andrés Enrique (2023). Restorative justice and community conflict

resolution. Caso: Cajamarca, Perú [Restorative justice and community conflict resolution.

Case: Cajamarca, Peru]. Iustitia Socialis. Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y

Criminalísticas, 8(15), 54-68.

Tello-Gilardi, J. (2022). Intersectionality and restorative juvenile justice [La interseccionalidad y la

justicia juvenil juvenil restaurativa]. Llapanchikpaq Journal: Justicia, 4(5), 19-72.

https://doi.org/10.51197/lj.v4i5.641

Vázquez Martínez, Alejandro Ernesto, & Bazán Mayagoitia, Norma Deirdré (2019). Restorative

Justice and Social Reintegration: Procedural and Structural Challenges [Justicia

restaurativa y reintegración social: retos procedimentales y estructurales]. URVIO

Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad, (24), 98-113.

https://doi.org/10.17141/urvio.24.2019.3789

the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/